This is wrong on so many levels, I hardly know where to start. First, there’s Ms. Garafalo’s hypocrisy in showing her intolerance of intolerance.

Second, there’s her scatalogical no-think on the issue of why teabaggers are, uh…teabagging. Her logic? Since (in her mind) no-one complained about Bush Jr’s spending, the only reason these people are here is because they don’t like black people. I mean, there couldn’t possibly be any other reason. Like say, the fact that Bush’s spending habits weren’t largely publicized until the $700 billion dollar bailout and that was at the end of his presidency. Even then, the rumblings were being heard. But usually, people don’t begin organizing until they see a pattern of government Tom Foolery in quick succession. That’s exactly what happened as President Obama took office. Bailouts were endorsed by him and passed by congress in quick succession which made Bush Jr’s $700 billion look paltry. By then, our government’s bailout B.S. was so well publicized that it became a household word. People organized and protested.

Finally, I wish to God the interviewer had answered Garafalo’s question by telling her in, perhaps, not so many words, what I just articulated.

Anyway, it’s nothing knew. Anytime, you disagree with a liberal, they’ll play any or all of the following: the race card, the sexism card, the change the subject by asking you a pointed question card, the screaming obscenities card, and, of course, let us not forget the fill-the-blank card. What else can they do? When you’ve made up your poor excuse for a mind that you don’t want to be confused by the facts, there’s really nothing left but obfuscation, smoke-n-mirrors, red-herrings…etc.