I was in full riot gear for over 24 hours, sleeping on a bus when it wasn’t my turn to stand in ranks to prevent the
“peace protestors” from storming the base. It was not “300″. Our little band of a hundred or so airmen with shields,, helmets and riot batons were more than enough for the small group protesting.

40,000? There weren’t 4000. Heck, I’d be surprised if there were 1000.

Point is, if you weren’t personally there, don’t argue about who’s armchair estimates you quote are right or wrong. Try clarifying, civilly, “Fox news says 3,000,000″ or “CNN says 300″ and let people draw their own conclusions.

As for your claim of "unconstitutionality" concerning article VI and Bush Jr's alleged statement that he wouldn't choose anyone who isn't a Christian to be a Supreme Court judge, I won't call you a liar, as you did me. But I will say that you are mistaken my wacky liberal friend. Article VI clearly says "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." Saying your picks are going to be "Christians" is not the same as requiring a religious test you knucklehead…any more than saying your picks are going to be this, that, and/or the other thing. The prez can pick anyone he pleases or hadn't you noticed? Article VI doesn't even apply to the president. It applies to the legislature, since they are the ones who have to confirm the nominee in question. BTW, I really resent you calling me a Bush supporter. Why don't you just cuss me out and talk trash about my mother? That's pretty low, even for you…"Bush supporter." But it's not nearly as low as calling me a liar. I've been your friend a long time. I've had many, many heated discussions with you, most of them revolving around politics. And while I didn't agree with you the majority of the time and in most cases, I thought you had your facts screwed up, I have never called you a liar. That was a cheap shot, bro. Next time you want to call me a liar, why don't you just pick up the phone or come over. Then we can have it out face to face. That would be much better than coming in here after months of silence with both barrels blazing and leaving me this pissy comment.

Concerning your statement about the political power of those opposing president Obama, all I can say is you and the rest of the liberwocks are in for a rude awakening come November.

Oh, and your psych evaluation notwithstanding, if the content is so bad, why are you wasting time coming in here to read it, much less to comment? Don't bother visiting if that's how you truly feel, man. You'll be happier and so will we.

That is a blatant lie, Chad. You can't even pass it off as "error."

At most, there were a million people. The majority of credible estimates say several hundred thousand.

The movement is nowhere near as popular as you claim, and it's about as diverse as a pile of poodle dung.

The "unconstitutionality" claim is hilarious. Wingnuts tried that same garbage with Medicare. I find this especially amusing coming from a Bush supporter. The same man who said he wouldn't nominate a judge to the Supreme Court unless he was a "Christian." A direct affront to Article VI.

This place reads like a dimestore psych eval.