Author Archive
Hey, homosexuality is only natural
Written by Ron McClure Jr.
Monday, 10 August 2009 12:48
9 Comments

According to Barack Obama, the United States is not a Christian nation, yet we are a Muslim “country.” In fact, many on the left would tell you that our founding fathers wanted to keep religion out of our government completely. That, my friends, is a different discussion for different day. But, what if we discount Christian morality? What, then, do we use to gauge right and wrong? Many would say that we only have to turn to nature and observe what the animals do. Hence, right and wrong should be defined, not by what is moral, but what is natural.

Homosexuality is natural. Take a look at penguins, and you will quickly see that homosexual couples are perfectly normal. Some gay penguin couples even pretend that rocks are eggs. Isn’t that sweet? Yes, modern society frowns upon the act of homosexuality, but nature is nature. So, how then can one disagree with human homosexuality when it has been documented in nature? I guess, you can’t. One can only apologize for being so closed-minded. I feel stupid — well, ignorant to be honest. How could I have been so callous? How could I have joined in on the frowning by an uniformed society? Maybe it’s bigotry…or maybe, it’s just civility. So, let’s talk about nature.

Homosexuality is natural. Yes, and polygamy is natural, too. Did you know that, in many species, one male procreates with many females? Well, you should. That knowledge would help you to justify a lot of the problems in humanity. I mean, a man’s natural instinct is to spread his seed, so how can you credibly chastise him for that? Adultery? Polygamy? Well, they’re just natural.

Have you ever heard of competitive infanticide (look under poygany)? It’s not really a big deal, but where in some species, males will kill other younger males to perpetuate their own virility. You know, eliminate the competition, like in business. Every human male would naturally kill a young boy to stop him from copulating with females, right? So what about murder? Relax, it’s only natural.

Let’s talk about nature. I hate you. You threaten me. I will kill you. That’s natural, right? You can’t judge me for killing you, because it happens in nature in almost every species. See that young girl over there? I think I want to have sex with her. I’ll try to make it quick, because, I – am – starving! Is KFC still open? Hey, if you don’t like it, well, I’ll just kill you. No, no, and absolutely no! You cannot punish me, because who are you? My behavior is 100% natural. Check science, buddy.

Monkeys fling their own poop at each other. Of course, it’s just a natural occurrence. What human doesn’t throw poop at other people in the heat of an argument? Uh, well, the civilized ones. That’s who.

I am so sick and tired of listening to the silver-tongued devils on the left — feeding us poetic words of love and acceptance. If they want to use nature as justification, then they need to be prepared to justify a whole world of evil. They need to be ready to release every murderer, rapist, child molester and thief in prison today, because those “crimes” are not crimes at all.

You see, any level-headed liberal would inform you that these actions are, well, only natural.

 
Al Gore compares global warming to Nazi Germany
Written by Ron McClure Jr.
Wednesday, 08 July 2009 09:27
No Comments
 
Michael Jackson: Predator or Prey?
Written by Ron McClure Jr.
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:25
50 Comments

I would like to start by saying this: abusing children in any way — emotionally, physically, or sexually — has to be one of the most evil and abhorrent actions in this world. Even convicted criminals will beat and kill child predators in prison. I think that practically every person has a little voice inside him that intensely — sometimes gently — speaks to him about what is right and what is wrong.

It’s no secret that Michael Jackson was accused of inappropriate sexual behavior with young children. But, what if Michael was innocent? What if all of Michael's friends are right — that he just really loved children in a completely innocent way?

Michael Jackson undoubtedly lived a life outside of the norm. Jackson was a victim of abuse himself. He was forced to live out his childhood under the adoring lights of the stage and the probing lights of a relentless press. As he grew, Michael began to long for a childhood that had been snatched from him. He spent most of his adult life trying to relive that childhood in a way that he was never afforded, and some would say that he built the lavish Neverland Ranch — adorned with trains, amusements and exotic animals — for this very reason. Often, he would have hundreds of kids as guests there for special celebrations and occasions. One thing was quite obvious, Michael Jackson lived his adult life like a child.

In 1993, the Chandler family had been very close friends with Michael. They were often referred to as Michael's "adopted family." After a rift had formed between MJ and Evan Chandler, Evan had made this statement, "There was no reason why he [Jackson] had to stop calling me." Evan then began to accuse Michael of sexually abusing his son. Evan had even drugged his son with sodium Amytal (a powerful sedative said to open people to suggestion) which was when the boy allegedly made the claims of abuse. When asked if he was concerned about how a law suit would affect his son, Evan Chandler made this statement in a taped phone conversation, “That's irrelevant to me…It will be a massacre if I don't get what I want." What he wanted was money.

Some might ask, “well, why would MJ have paid that boy if he was innocent?” That’s a good question. It's conceivable that an innocent man would pay money — an amount seemingly inconsequential to him — in order to make a bad situation go away. Especially since Jackson did so under advice from family. Is it possible that Michael never meant to imply his guilt by settling that case? On the other hand, Evan Chandler demanded money before he ever brought criminal charges against Michael. If the evidence against Michael was so damning, why would any father seek money over legal action? What kind of father would want an evil man to go free and continue to terrorize more children?

So, after being accused in 1993, Michael began a downward spiral of prescription drug abuse. He had been wounded by one of the only people he trusted — a child. Think about it. Aside from some plastic surgery, which was likely a product of his fragile child-like self-image, Michael Jackson had not began to act like a “freak,” as some say, before that first accusation. Everything that followed was a product of what he had become — a prescription drug junkie.

Like I have said before, I will never really know what happened. But, just what if, by chance, Evan Chandler did sinisterly encourage his son to make accusations to extort money from Michael? The boy's mother vehemently declared that Michael had done nothing wrong. And it is quite interesting that everyone close to Michael Jackson still claims he never molested any children.

If Michael was indeed innocent, can you even begin to imagine the hell that he lived in for so many years — the unrelenting pedophile jokes, death threats, hateful letters and despising looks. I'm not trying to defend Michael Jackson, but at what point do we draw the line between protecting our children and needlessly destroying a man’s life? Was Michael Jackson truly a predator, or was he actually the prey of greedy liars? Only God and few people really know.