Category: domestic policy
Illegal aliens, ants, protestors, and the Arizona immigration law

Life is grand isn't it? Especially when you live in a country where complete  morons are allowed to stick their protuberances into other people's business.

Case in point (or maybe it should be "and"): Arizona. Maybe you noticed the protest in which UNamiable dunces descended on Arizona in order to tell the citizens there how THEY think things should be run in their own state. The arrogance, the idiocy, the buffoonery…it's baffling. Or do you disagree? I mean hell, I don't even live in Arizona and I was offended on behalf of its citizens who have to endure the "illegal" problem and all the attendant baggage which comes with it.

But just who the hell do these "compassionate" imbecilic out-of-towners think they are? …protesting the Arizona law…a law designed to protect the lives of those who actually live in Arizona…legally. Most of the protesters don't live in Arizona and correspondingly, they have no idea what Arizonians on the border have to deal with. The remainder of the protesters are the illegals who some might say have a conflict of interest. Ridiculous.

This is analogous to my "Ant" problem. Every summer I have ants coming across my borders and into my living space. They wreak havoc on my personal environment. In extreme cases they aren't just a nuisance, they cause harm….ruining food and thus costing me money when I have to replace that food and when I have to step up deterrents to secure the borders around my castle. I think I have the right to do what's necessary within the law to protect my place of residence from harmful squatters. Now, I'm not so sure…Last night I came home to a media circus: Five major networks camped outside my residence; a throng of protesters (mostly from the PETI organization (People for the Ethical Treatment of Insects). They are chanting, hold up signs, getting ugly. It's a spectacle of unparalleled and unbridled jettisoning of reason in the liberwock tradition. What are they protesting? Why,  my treatment of the ants, of course. I'm violating their insect rights, they say. I'm not being humane. I owe these ants. I must not only endure them, but I must make my home a place where they can relax and prop up their uh…little ant legs. They must be fed and quartered at my expense. If I comply with the demands of the protesters, I'm told they (the protesters NOT the ants) will leave and go back to the place where they live…which by the way is completely devoid of ants.

All of these folks have a few things in common:

  1. I have never seen them before (and I don't know why I would have….SINCE THEY DON'T LIVE HERE!!!)
  2. Having not been residents at my home, they have no idea what I have to deal with on a daily basis with these illegal insects crossing the border into my living space.
  3. These people have the arrogance and the Barack Obamalike audacity to tell me that I can't dictate what actions will be taken in order to make mine and my family's residence safe and secure from illegal insects.
  4. They all have the common sense I.Q. of a peanut.
 
Kilroy Says: U.S. should take cues from commies when it comes to swine flu

What do you do when a potentially pandemic strain of virus breaks out in a country bordering yours? ANSWER: You follow the example of Red China, Cuba, and Argentina.

After it was announced last week that a new strain of swine flu was sweeping Mexico, the Chinese, along with some other folks around the globe took appropriate action. They either (A) banned travel to and from Mexico, or (B) greatly discouraged travel to that country and added other countermeasures to help ensure containment within their own country.

My question is why aren’t we following suit? Here is the World Health Organization's (WHO) lame answer to that question:

From the AP: “…it's too late for that tactic…border controls do not work. Travel restrictions do not work”

How can WHO know that? I agree with them that it’s too late to contain the virus; it’s already in the U.S. But why make things worse by allowing potentially infected people to continue coming into our country? I don’t get that at all. How is it that Beijing of all places cares more about it’s people than Washington? This is just crazy. But wait; there’s more.

The “WHO is referring to the situation as a ‘public-health emergency of international concern.’ Some scientists have even gone on record to say that it’s only a matter of time before this virus gains pandemic status.

But my more immediate concern is our lack of an adequate response to this virus in light of not only its ramifications for the U.S., but of our knowledge about the virus’s source.

“…Only one American has been infected so far who had not recently traveled to Mexico – a woman in Kansas got sick after her husband returned from a business trip in that country, where he became ill…”

So we know this thing came from Mexico. We know that scores of people are both traveling to and from Mexico even as I hammer out this post. We know that these travelers are at risk for contracting and carrying this virus across our borders and infecting others, thereby speeding up the spread of this virus. Yet our borders remain open.

The only thing being done on the border now is a passive surveillance screening of people coming from Mexico into this country.

“Any traveler coming from a country with a confirmed human swine flu infection will be questioned, checked for symptoms and potentially isolated if they are found ill. Though the CDC has issued public warnings about the more serious outbreak in Mexico, there are no recommendations from Washington against traveling to the neighboring country.”

To my utter shock and disbelief, the same article went on to state that our response “is in contrast to the more extreme actions of some other governments, including Hong Kong, where officials on Sunday urged residents to avoid going to Mexico. Hong Kong officials also ordered the immediate detention in a hospital of anyone who arrives with a fever above 100.4 F, respiratory symptoms and a history of traveling over the past seven days to a city with a confirmed case of swine flu infection.” Emphasis mine.

Even Cuba (yes Cuba) and Argentina have banned flights to Mexico in an effort to slow the spread of this outbreak.

Unbelievable.

 
Mandatory urin tests for welfare recipients

A viewer sent this to me today. It's another chain email, so we couldn't find the source. Anyway, I thought it was kind of interesting nonetheless. Maybe you will too…

Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their "you know what," doing drugs, while I work. . .. . Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't. Hope you all will pass it along, though . .. Something has to change in this country — and soon!