Category: domestic policy
NumbersUSA watching new immigration proposals

Potential for Both Good and Bad in 25 “Reforms”
By Staff Reports
MTW News

WASHINGTON, DC – NumbersUSA today applauded the Administration’s announced “no-match” regulation to reduce the number of employers hiring illegal aliens, and to increase the use of the Basic Pilot Program for workforce verification, re-named “E-Verify.” Some of the other 23 proposed “reforms” are part of existing law, and others have the potential to increase the number of immigrants and open loopholes in our national security.

“It is heartening to see that the Administration recognizes that a significant portion of immigration law needs to be implemented,” said NumbersUSA Executive Director Roy Beck. “Interior enforcement, particularly in the workplace, is the cornerstone of the Attrition through Enforcement approach to solving our illegal immigration problems.”

Among the “reforms” are regulations that are yet to be promulgated, including streamlining existing guestworker programs. While it is better to improve current programs than to implement new ones, it is unclear whether the regulations will unnecessarily raise the numbers of guestworkers. Additionally, NumbersUSA has concerns about whether the changes to the guestworker programs and the proposed expedition of background checks will result in increased deficiencies in our national security.

“The devil is in the details of the coming regulations, and it is my sincere hope that this won’t be a case of one step forward, two steps back,” said Beck. “Americans will be watching closely to make sure that these promises of enforcement will not be a Trojan horse drastically increasing the number of immigrants in the U.S."

 
How many tacos does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Roll Pop?

The following unattributable post was sent to us from an anonymous "donor." Given the current state of affairs in education (a misnomer) and immigration, we offer this as food for thought for our readers.

Subject: Teaching Math – 1950 to Today

I purchased a burger at Burger King for $3.58. The counter girl took my $5.00 I was digging for change when I pulled eight cents from my pocket and gave it to her. She stood there, holding the nickel and three pennies,looking at the screen on her register. I sensed her discomfort and tried to tell her to just give me two quarters and a dollar bill, but she hailed the manager for help. While he tried to explain the transaction to her, she stood there and cried.

Why do I tell you this? Please continue to read.

The evolution in teaching math since the 1950s:

——————————————————-

1. Teaching Math In 1950

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit?

——————————————————-

2. Teaching Math In 1960

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit?

——————————————————-

3. Teaching Math In 1970

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80. Did he make a profit?

——————————————————-

4. Teaching Math In 1980

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

——————————————————-

5. Teaching Math In 1990

A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a profit of $20. What do you think of this way of making a living? Topic for class participation after answering the question:How did the birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their homes? (There are no wrong answers)

——————————————————-

6.Teaching Math In 2006

Unhachero vende una carretada de maderapara $100. El costo de la producciones es$80. Cuanto dinero ha hecho?

 
Bush/Kennedy bill goes South…

It was a good day to die for the Bush/Kennedy "amnesty" bill. Sorry, but I can't help visualizing this bill in the midst of Dante's Inferno. The mental image brings a smile to my face. My sleep will be sweet tonight.

"I think the only victory here is for the American people and, symbolically, a government of the people and for the people. The people responded to this issue in a very emotional and just a very engaged way, which changed the minds of many people here in the Senate," said U.S. Senator Jim DeMint.

You said it Jim. The elitist politicians who supported this bill had more to worry about than how they were going to cash in on promises made by the Bush White House in exchange for selling out the American people. Some of our elected officials' jobs were on the line and I think they knew it.

I'm just blown away by what it took to get these bureaucrats' attention. The public outcry was substantial before they voted to put this thing back in play earlier in the week. Yet, they went forward, apparently unhindered in their zeal to ram this thing down our throats.

This was a win for legal immigrants, a win for the American people, and a win for democracy. Pick out your tombstone below: