Category: government
Kilroy Says: U.S. should take cues from commies when it comes to swine flu

What do you do when a potentially pandemic strain of virus breaks out in a country bordering yours? ANSWER: You follow the example of Red China, Cuba, and Argentina.

After it was announced last week that a new strain of swine flu was sweeping Mexico, the Chinese, along with some other folks around the globe took appropriate action. They either (A) banned travel to and from Mexico, or (B) greatly discouraged travel to that country and added other countermeasures to help ensure containment within their own country.

My question is why aren’t we following suit? Here is the World Health Organization's (WHO) lame answer to that question:

From the AP: “…it's too late for that tactic…border controls do not work. Travel restrictions do not work”

How can WHO know that? I agree with them that it’s too late to contain the virus; it’s already in the U.S. But why make things worse by allowing potentially infected people to continue coming into our country? I don’t get that at all. How is it that Beijing of all places cares more about it’s people than Washington? This is just crazy. But wait; there’s more.

The “WHO is referring to the situation as a ‘public-health emergency of international concern.’ Some scientists have even gone on record to say that it’s only a matter of time before this virus gains pandemic status.

But my more immediate concern is our lack of an adequate response to this virus in light of not only its ramifications for the U.S., but of our knowledge about the virus’s source.

“…Only one American has been infected so far who had not recently traveled to Mexico – a woman in Kansas got sick after her husband returned from a business trip in that country, where he became ill…”

So we know this thing came from Mexico. We know that scores of people are both traveling to and from Mexico even as I hammer out this post. We know that these travelers are at risk for contracting and carrying this virus across our borders and infecting others, thereby speeding up the spread of this virus. Yet our borders remain open.

The only thing being done on the border now is a passive surveillance screening of people coming from Mexico into this country.

“Any traveler coming from a country with a confirmed human swine flu infection will be questioned, checked for symptoms and potentially isolated if they are found ill. Though the CDC has issued public warnings about the more serious outbreak in Mexico, there are no recommendations from Washington against traveling to the neighboring country.”

To my utter shock and disbelief, the same article went on to state that our response “is in contrast to the more extreme actions of some other governments, including Hong Kong, where officials on Sunday urged residents to avoid going to Mexico. Hong Kong officials also ordered the immediate detention in a hospital of anyone who arrives with a fever above 100.4 F, respiratory symptoms and a history of traveling over the past seven days to a city with a confirmed case of swine flu infection.” Emphasis mine.

Even Cuba (yes Cuba) and Argentina have banned flights to Mexico in an effort to slow the spread of this outbreak.

Unbelievable.

 
AIG: Government transparency apparently equals ambiguous duplicity

This past week, we have all been watching as Congress has relentlessly been chastising AIG for paying bonuses with the taxpayers’ bailout money. In fact, the harsh and poignant language has initiated a nationwide outcry against AIG, leading to numerous ad hominem attacks and death threats directed at AIG employees. And, the House of Representatives has once again hastily pushed through a 90% punitive tax bill that will target the recipients of the bonuses allocated by companies receiving bailout funds.

House members have been objectionably vociferous in condemning the bailout distributions by the economic giant, AIG:

Rep. Steve Israel, D-New York: "The American people have had it with all the posturing and the politics, they want their money back."

Rep. Kendrick Meek, D-Florida: "No one is calling my district office and saying 'Congressman, please file an inquiry into these bonuses.' They're saying get it back and get it back now."

Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colorado:. We will subpoena your boards and haul you before Congress. We will use personal rhetoric to decry your greed — we will make life miserable."

Even President Obama has publicly jumped on board the tongue-lashing locomotive, railroading companies like AIG, as he made history being the first sitting president to appear on the “Tonight Show With Jay Leno”:

"Everybody's angry," he said. "But I think that the best way to handle this is to make sure that you close the door before the horse gets out of the barn. And what happened here was the money's already gone out, and people are scrambling to try to find ways to get back at them."

What the president is not telling you is that he secretly supported the AIG bonuses. I couldn’t believe it either, but in my investigation, I discovered several things I found hard to believe. I think it is necessary for all Americans to know the true story behind the AIG bonus scandal.

First, in an earlier post on BloggersBase, A-I-Gee Whiz!, I posed the question, “How hard is it to say, ‘if – you – take – this – money, – you – can't – use – it – for – bonuses’?” I also questioned the competence of our Congress for failing to make such stipulations, and then acting outraged when the bonuses were payed. However, it appears that a bipartisan amendment to the latest stimulus bill in February was proposed by Senators Olympia Snowe, R–Maine, and Ron Wyden, D–Oregon, that would have placed a 35% excise tax on bonuses in excess of $100,000 paid from the bailout coffers. It passed in the Senate, but in last minute closed-door negotiations between the White House and the House of Representatives, the amendment was dropped.

In an interview, Senator Snowe (amendment co-sponsor) told CNN: "We tried. It simply didn't happen, and that's a tragedy, given what's happened today [March 17]." Majority Leader Harry Reid dodged a question from CNN, when asked if dropping the amendment was a mistake.

When questioned about the new punitive tax bill, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Montana, reportedly stated, "Frankly it was such a rush — we're talking about the stimulus bill now — to get it passed, I didn't have time and other conferees didn't have time to address many of the provisions that were modified significantly…We shouldn't be here. That should have passed, but it didn't."

If that were not enough, an exemption clause was added to the February stimulus bill that said new rules "shall not be construed to prohibit any bonus payment required to be paid pursuant to a written employment contract executed on or before February 11, 2009." The added exemption clause directly permitted paying the AIG bonuses that are now being so heatedly admonished.

So what about President Obama’s secret support of the AIG bonuses? A Wall Street Journal website (online.wsj.com) reports that “Members of the administration question whether the appearance of unpredictability by Congress gives potential investors the idea the government program is too risky.” And that, “Administration officials are worried banks won't participate in the program or won't be able to attract talented managers to run the firms because of the bonus restrictions.” Remember, the last minute changes in the February stimulus bill – the ones that permitted the bonus allocations – were a product of “closed door negotiations” between the White House and the House of Representatives.

So, as you listen to all of the overly dramatic outrageмебели софия being expressed by Congress and the White House, don’t forget that they knowingly paved the road to the AIG bonus scandal. And what happened to the promise of a new government of transparency? Well, in my search for the truth (which was very time-consuming) I had to dig my way through a tangled web of ambiguous duplicity.

 
Gaffes of international proportions

This will be short.

All ideology aside, I am embarrassed to be an American right now. Obama ran his campaign partially under the new paradigm of "mending international fences."

Well, this past week has left us with egg on our faces. First, Obama blatantly snubbed Prime Minister Gordon Brown from the United Kingdom. Not to mention that Obama had already returned a 9/11 gift from the UK.

On Friday, March 6, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton presented Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov with a "reset button" gift that was incorrectly inscribed with a word that had a completely different meaning than what was  supposedly "intended."


Clinton
: "I would like to present you with a little gift that represents what President Obama and Vice President Biden and I have been saying and that is: 'We want to reset our relationship and so we will do it together.'"

Clinton, laughing, added, "We worked hard to get the right Russian word. Do you think we got it?" she asked Lavrov.

"You got it wrong," Lavrov said." Both diplomats laughed. "It should be "perezagruzka" (the Russian word for reset,) Lavrov said. "This says 'peregruzka,' which means 'overcharged.'"

As if that were not enough, Clinton tried to save face after the press-conference with some words that simply made her to look as if she were "fishing" for a valid connotation of the incorrect word:

Clinton: "In a way, the word that's on the button turns out to be also true," Clinton said. "We are resetting, and because we are resetting, the minister and I have an overload of work."


It doesn't  matter to me which U.S. administration would carelessly make Americans look this stupid, I would be just as humiliated. We look extremely idiotic in the eyes of the international community because of these negligent actions.