Category: Politics
Attorney General Eric Holder is a big fat bleeping idiot
Written by Chad Phillips
Monday, 12 July 2010 12:30
5 Comments

It's true you know…Only complete dunces like Eric Holder and the rest of the Obama regime could force me out of retirement to blog politics. Why, you may ask? Okay, I know only a liberal would ask that question, but I digress…

FROM THE AP: The Obama administration sued Arizona on Tuesday, arguing that the state is impinging on federal responsibilities for dealing with immigration.

Well, it doesn't take a PhD to understand that if the Feds were doing their flipping jobs in the first place, Arizona wouldn't have to do it for them. Duh!

Furthermore, this is the same Eric Holder who said that the Arizona law was racist and that he was considering bringing a lawsuit against the Arizona legislature without ever having read the law. This is coming from the highest law enforcement officer in the land? That he's considering bringing suit on the basis of his assumptions about a law he hasn't even read? Of course, now we know the man is serious, even if functionally insane. Since Tuesday last, the feds did in fact sue. Is this what we're to expect from your henchmen Comrade Obama? That your goons will go after any state which refuses to breathe the tainted air inside your liberal bubble? This isn't getting way out of hand; it's already there…like so far off the map, we're talking another galaxy here. (Sorry about the mixed metaphors, but I've just finished watching the entire series of the original Star Trek.) Anyway, I just feel so privileged that I can watch the buffoonery of the Obama administration from the comfort of my captain's chair, parked squarely in front of my computer. I mean, good God America- how long must we endure this complete moronathon in the guise of "good" government?

If that weren't bad enough, he's at it again! Now, Eric Holder is threatening another suit based on racial profiling. According to the AP:

The Justice Department hasn't ruled out filing a second lawsuit challenging Arizona's immigration law if evidence shows racial profiling at work, Attorney General Eric Holder says.

Once again, this is just more of the Obama administration's moonbattyness to the inth degree. The law is written to inoculate against racial profiling. But don't take my word for it; see for yourself:

For any lawful contact made by a law enforcement official or a law enforcement agency…where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States, a reasonable attempt shall be made, when practicable, to determine the immigration status of the person…

Emphasis mine

The operative words here are "lawful" and  "contact." Lawful contact means that the officer is already in the act of detaining the individual because they broke the law. This language was crafted  explicitly as an antidote against racial profiling. That means that either Eric Holder is an incompetent dingbat who still hasn't read the law and thus has no flipping idea what the hell he's talking about, or…he has finally read the law and is incapable of understanding it, in which case, I stand by my original assertion that the man is a big fat bleeping idiot,  intent on steamrolling Arizona's right to protect its citizens.

 
Illegal aliens, ants, protestors, and the Arizona immigration law
Written by Chad Phillips
Monday, 07 June 2010 16:28
No Comments

Life is grand isn't it? Especially when you live in a country where complete  morons are allowed to stick their protuberances into other people's business.

Case in point (or maybe it should be "and"): Arizona. Maybe you noticed the protest in which UNamiable dunces descended on Arizona in order to tell the citizens there how THEY think things should be run in their own state. The arrogance, the idiocy, the buffoonery…it's baffling. Or do you disagree? I mean hell, I don't even live in Arizona and I was offended on behalf of its citizens who have to endure the "illegal" problem and all the attendant baggage which comes with it.

But just who the hell do these "compassionate" imbecilic out-of-towners think they are? …protesting the Arizona law…a law designed to protect the lives of those who actually live in Arizona…legally. Most of the protesters don't live in Arizona and correspondingly, they have no idea what Arizonians on the border have to deal with. The remainder of the protesters are the illegals who some might say have a conflict of interest. Ridiculous.

This is analogous to my "Ant" problem. Every summer I have ants coming across my borders and into my living space. They wreak havoc on my personal environment. In extreme cases they aren't just a nuisance, they cause harm….ruining food and thus costing me money when I have to replace that food and when I have to step up deterrents to secure the borders around my castle. I think I have the right to do what's necessary within the law to protect my place of residence from harmful squatters. Now, I'm not so sure…Last night I came home to a media circus: Five major networks camped outside my residence; a throng of protesters (mostly from the PETI organization (People for the Ethical Treatment of Insects). They are chanting, hold up signs, getting ugly. It's a spectacle of unparalleled and unbridled jettisoning of reason in the liberwock tradition. What are they protesting? Why,  my treatment of the ants, of course. I'm violating their insect rights, they say. I'm not being humane. I owe these ants. I must not only endure them, but I must make my home a place where they can relax and prop up their uh…little ant legs. They must be fed and quartered at my expense. If I comply with the demands of the protesters, I'm told they (the protesters NOT the ants) will leave and go back to the place where they live…which by the way is completely devoid of ants.

All of these folks have a few things in common:

  1. I have never seen them before (and I don't know why I would have….SINCE THEY DON'T LIVE HERE!!!)
  2. Having not been residents at my home, they have no idea what I have to deal with on a daily basis with these illegal insects crossing the border into my living space.
  3. These people have the arrogance and the Barack Obamalike audacity to tell me that I can't dictate what actions will be taken in order to make mine and my family's residence safe and secure from illegal insects.
  4. They all have the common sense I.Q. of a peanut.
 
Is there anything which can save Obama’s presidency?
Written by Chad Phillips
Wednesday, 12 May 2010 18:20
No Comments

A friend of mine recently sent me a link to a very entertaining read called The Toilet Paper. In this particular issue, they were having a bit of fun at the expense of supreme court nominee, Elena Kagan. Their dig was in reference to both Kagan's physical "beauty" and her "wealth" of experience. It turns out she has neither. You're probably wondering what this has to do with saving "The Great One's" presidency. Don't worry my liberal friends, read on and you will have your answer.

Actually, the email about Kagan made me think of a parallel to Obama. You see, just like Obama, she's got lots of education…and no experience. And just as Obama was positioned to be a power player (who never played), Kagan is positioned to be the same. Political nutroots are acting like this scenario never happened before. It's all experimental, you see, and we who are so critical…so quick to pass judgment, couldn't possibly know the outcome of what I'm terming,  the Kagan Experiment. But we do know don't we. Because Obama has been elected by those poor souls who can't see past the ends of their noses, the rest of us are experiencing, firsthand, how such experiments turn out. This observation led me to reflect on Obama's current approval ratings, which are hovering around 44%. It also made me wonder what, if anything, could save this man's presidency, especially, if his ratings continue plummeting into the 2012 general election?

There's only one thing…are you ready for this? I don't think you are, but I'm going to hit you with it anyway: a faux-assassination attempt. Think of it. It's the only thing which might be enough to swing public sentiment in his favor, enough to keep him in office for a second term, enough to even make his opponents fearful of attacking him for his ideological, and thus his legislative agenda. Hollywood would be only too happy to oblige this president by setting up (next to the latest string of government handouts) the largest con ever perpetrated in history: the mock failed assassination of the president of the United States. If his numbers keep tanking, look for it late in 2012. And remember…you heard it here first.

That's my prediction. Lest you think it's too far out in (AHEM) left field, let me remind you I predicted Bush Jr's lame duck presidency in his second term, the subsequent government handouts to corporate America (Uncle Sugar sympathizers call 'em bailouts) and Obama's landslide victory in 2008. Most of my conservative friends were dismissing me then too. Now I've got your attention.

Chew on that one a while.