Category: religion
SAVE YOURSELF!

Ever wear a life preserver when you were in a boat? Ever wear your seatbelt when you drive? Ever get a flu shot?

Those are all actions that many folks choose to avoid because they’re inconvenient or uncomfortable, despite the fact they could save your life. Gambling with your life is pretty foolish. Gambling with damnation is stupid.

Chairman Maobama has declared the United States not a country of Christians, but people with "ideals." That’s very sad, as ideals won’t save your immortal soul.

I know that the whole debate of science vs religion is a heated one, but I’d say that around the world, over 80% of all human beings believe there is a life after death. Here in the U.S., the belief in the afterlife is so strong we’re in a current upsurge in Ghost-oriented TV Shows, where folks try to take pictures or record spirits at haunted sites.

So, I’m not going to argue whether or not we have souls. If you think you don’t, stop reading.

If you’re still with me, I’m going to ask you a simple question: Do you want to save yourself?

Before you get all uppity, I’m not suggesting that you log off the internet and plop down in front of Trinity Broadcasting or dash out to buy some evangelical biography. I’m suggesting you form your own opinions. And to do that, you need to go to the source: the Bible.

Some of you may not want to read the Bible. You’ve gotten a pretty distorted vision of what Christianity is from television preachers, out to make you donate your hard-earned cash, until it hurts. Or you’ve seen preachers like Jesse Jackson stick their nose in politics and offer sermons that seem counter to what they claim Christianity is. This may have even driven many of you to read the Koran, or the tales of Confucius, or maybe L Ron Hubbard’s greatest work of fiction.

But have you read the Bible?

Up until a few hundred years ago, most folks couldn’t read the Bible, or the Koran, or any religious text. Illiteracy was wide spread. Instead, folks had to go to Church, temple, etc., and listen to someone tell them what was in there.

But you can read.

Have you ever read the Bible? How about just the New Testament? The first Four Gospels? One of the Gospels?

You’ve read novels. Maybe you’ve read stereo instructions or the manual that came with your new car. You clearly read a lot on the internet. Are any of those readings going to save your immortal soul?

When it comes to Christianity, it strikes me as just such an amazing bout of laziness for people to not read the Bible, at least once. Instead of listening to what one person tells you what you have to do to be saved, why not find out for yourself?

I would love to pose the question to our "President" from Kenya. "Have you ever read the Bible?" We know that he is thoroughly familiar with the Koran, having been educated in a Islamic schools as a child. But did he read the Bible himself, or just sit in Reverend Wright’s church for 20 years listening to what is allegedly in the Bible?

Finally, here’s something else to consider. People get life insurance, "in case" they die. People wear seatbelts, "in case" they have a wreck. Fighter pilots wear parachutes, "in case" they have to eject from their aircraft. What if the Bible is right? What if your immortal soul will spend eternity damned unless you follow some simple Bible teachings?

I know that Americans tend to let others do their thinking for them these days — who to vote for, what clothes to wear, and even what foods to eat. But when it comes to something as important as where you’ll be spending eternity, don’t be a slacker. Read a Bible at least once.

No one else can Save you — you have to Save yourself.

 
Tom Cruise, Scientologist

This video, available through YouTube, offers us a chilling snapshot of Scientologist, Tom Cruise waxing philosophical about his faith.

In fairness to Cruise, the "interview" is a bit hard to follow, because, in it, there are no questions shown being asked of him. It appears that if any questions were asked, they were edited out of the original. So, in the final cut, what you see are a concatenation of his answers. Thus, you really have no context for Cruise's meanderings other than the stigma of Scientology.

However, even with that background, Cruise still says some things which are disturbing to all but the "initiated." He apparently divides the world into two groups: those who belong on the playing field and those who don't. He also talks a lot about creating new realities and "doing something" to fix the world. We never really know just what Cruise means when he makes these references. The whole "interview" is as ambiguous as it is disturbing.

You can also find interesting commentary on this spot at Slate and Gawker. Both sites have been bold enough to feature either commentary, and/or actual footage of Cruise, speaking to the subject of Scientology.

 
Biblical Quandaries

As a Bible believing Christian, I am well acquainted with problem passages in scripture and how scholars resolve them. In the past, I even ascribed to some of the explanations for apparent logical contradictions/problem texts. Below is just one which I didn't used to have a problem with, because I accepted the "exception to the rule" view posited by conservative scholars. It's amazing what a few years of study can do to a person's epistemology. Anyway, here's the quandary.

 

In the book of Genesis, we encounter the age old question, "Where did Cain get his wife?" But actually, that's the wrong question. If one studies the text closely, the implications are that the world's population was substantial by the time of Cain's exile. More important than the "where?" question, is the "how?" question. That is, how does God populate the planet without violating his immutable character?

Bible scholars the world over have answered that question by ascribing a monogenistic paradigm to the Genesis account. The problem is monogenism violates the Levitical Laws governing sexual behavior. Scholars have tried to explain this away by stating that the previous order was abrogated later on because of the genetic defects subsequent to The Fall. But, if that is the case, there is no hint of it in Leviticus. To the contrary, it states that it is "wickedness" to have sexual relations with those who are "near of kin." Near of kin is defined as a parent, sibling, niece, nephew, granddaughter, or grandson. Based on what is outlined in the Law, a monogenistic paradigm is impossible without violating the immutable character of God as embodied in the OT laws governing sexual behavior. To keep God from being inconsistent a scenario involving polygenism would have to be necessary. However, the Biblical narrative offers no explanation as to how this is possible.