Posts Tagged ‘conservatives’
The Beauty of Conservativism

My friend Zak has a recent entry about how dangerous an Obama Presidency would be, and if anything, I think he understates the threat. Obama is so dangerous it's almost surreal, and I say that for one simple reason: no one before Obama could know so little, make so many mistakes, demonstrate serious/fatal flaws of character and judgment, be linked to racists and terrorists, backtrack repeatedly, commit shocking verbal miscues, propose ruinous programs and taxes, desire to negotiate with maniacs, and have all of it, every last and future shocking blunder not merely overlooked by the media, but actively buried as needed.

It's also shocking how weak and silent conservatives appear to be with respect to Obama's nonsensical candidacy, and yet I can understand why – conservatives have been betrayed by Republicans and there seem to be no good options at this point – save one…

Conservatives know that virtually everything liberals propose and enact is doomed to failure. I can't think of a single liberal program that works, and eventually everything they implement has to be changed, scaled back or eliminated and only their own corruption keeps this process from happening as quickly as it should, but every country that has gone the liberal-socialist-communist route has had to scrap their failed policies and return to a market-based economy. The free market is not just a better way, it's the only way.

So no matter how bleak things look for conservatives, all they have to do is wait. Unfortunately, as we know, the waiting is the hardest part, so what's a conservative to do in the meantime? It's actually quite simple really, he does his best to avoid leaving himself at the mercy of liberal idiots – he saves, he spends his money on things that make money, he builds wealth, he conserves, he makes himself as self-sufficient as he can. And where possible, he puts himself in a position to benefit from liberal folly.

On a broader scale, conservatives only need wait for each inevitable crisis. We knew that our energy situation was headed for disaster. Absolutely nothing was being done to sustain growth much less make us self-sufficient. Sooner or later there had to be huge price increases and/or disruptions in our fuel supplies. The same thing will happen as warmalarmists manipulate the market, and that will be far worse. Believe me, you don't have to be a genius to see that – you have to be a complete moron not to. Of course, America has no shortage of morons, and the scientific community seems to have a highly disproportionate share of them.

Writing on the American Thinker yesterday, Christopher Chantrill said this:

"If you look back over the last 30 years, back over the record of conservative reform, there is one thing that stands out. Conservative reform never had a chance unless there was a crisis. The Reaganomics of hard money and low tax rates only got done in the crisis of Carter inflation/recession. The Bush tax cuts only got passed in the tech meltdown. Welfare reform only got passed when Newt Gingrich put a gun to President Clinton's reelection prospects in 1996."

It's indisputable, conservatives eventually are left to clean up the messes liberals create. The fear, of course, is that someday, liberals will create the ultimate mess that leaves us forever worse off, and Americans never seem to learn from history and their own mistakes. And since half the country is liberal, that means half of all Americans simply can't learn. As evidence, look what's happening in the midst of enormous energy turmoil they themselves are responsible for. Liberals still somehow think conservatives are to blame, and when asked how that makes logical sense, they argue that the oil companies have conspired with Republicans and conservatives to restrict flow and gouge consumers. Even if that were true, exactly how would taxing "excess profits" rectify anything?

So let the waiting game continue. The public will eventually, as always, have to turn to conservative ideas because no liberal idea can work The sad part is that if Republicans had stayed true to conservative ideals in the first place, many of the current problems might have been avoided. But since liberals have gained control of the Congress, as you knew they would, things have only gotten worse. They try to blame Bush, and I'd be the first to join them if Bush were culpable, but the fact is, not only does the President not have control of anything at this point, he's the one who ran in 2000 on the proposition for drilling in Alaska, and Clinton is the one who had vetoed the idea previously.

And it doesn't even matter whether anyone recognizes that because no matter what happened in the past, only conservative policy has a chance of stemming the crisis.

So you can imagine the damage a Democrat Congress and an incompetent Obama can do. And will do. Right now, at this very moment, Obama has not a single answer for anything, yet people squeal and swoon and the media delights, as he calls for change. Well believe me, if he's elected, they're going to get change all right. McCain's only half as bad!

But half of "enormously bad" could be immensely better. Nothing good can come of an Obama Presidency because there's nothing good going into it. His own campaign slogan attests to it -

Obama – the rottenest man who ever ran.

Editor's Note: When he isn't contributing to MTW, Ted West spends his time blogging politics over at The Naked Conservative. The image of Obama in diapers is courtesy of MTW contributor T.R. Oglodad. If you like T.R.'s images, you can find more at his blog, Troglodad.

 
When it comes to higher taxes, Americans are the real losers

One of the most irritating things is when media and politicians jump on the bandwagon of believing that the best way America should go is to increase taxes, especially on the wealthy!

John McCain is said to be “pandering” and following the “party line” when he says taxes should be lower. He has changed his position a little bit, but the change is a good change.

See: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24305534

Even though the political swing seems to have gone harder left in Washington, some think that McCain should move more toward the “middle.” One would think that McCain has been just like George Bush who is probably considered “far right” for the moment. But this notion isn’t consistent with reality.

McCain, on the other hand, really is middle of the road! For the purpose of comparison, just look at some of John F. Kennedy’s ideas on taxes. Kennedy is still seen as a Democrat hero today, but today some of Kennedy’s ideas on taxes would make him look like a Republican. This is ironic because McCain’s ideas about taxation are very close to Kennedy. Yet, when McCain suggests taxes should be lower, he is seen as pandering to his party.

Moving onward…Why do jobs leave America?

The Obama/Clinton answer seems to be that it’s the big, nasty corporations which are at fault! Corporations are the source of all our problems!

But corporations employ a huge percentage of Americans, including a huge number of many middle-income Americans. For the corporations that stay, those taxes are passed not only on to the consumer, but also to middle-income Americans who work for the corporations. Furthermore, even the “little guys” put their eggs in the stock market basket, where the smart money says, over the long term, they will see gains. Who is the little guy investing in to depend on good returns? You guessed it. THE BIG CORPORATIONS!

Blaming the corporations may get votes of those who don’t know better, and vote with their hearts and not their minds, but it is the corporations that are responsible for producing a huge amount of wealth for all of America.

Private industry and enterprise is the source of America’s greatness, not the government. The government is better at getting in the way of real solutions to our economic woes. In fact, the economy has gotten even worse since Democrats have taken power, and they’re the ones with the most control over policies. Never mind that “it’s all Bush’s fault” we know! He was responsible for sending Hurricane Katrina to the coast using his super- secret weather control devices. For liberals, Bush Jr. is responsible for everything from bad weather to bad policy, which is convenient. This is despite the fact that a president just doesn’t have that kind of power.

So do big corporations still serve us by moving overseas? The answer is yes. With lower taxes, they can reap higher returns for investors as they sell goods around the world and still keep the prices of products for American consumers low.

Low taxes, even for the “Big, nasty, evil and insensitive corporations” are a winner. Lower taxes for everyone are a winner.

So go ahead…Keep telling us that higher taxes are good for us media and politicians. For those of us who know better, this is akin to drinking the hemlock. For the rest, it’s just a new flavor of Kool-Aid.

In the meantime, you politicians can keep up all the unnecessary spending! Yeah, we know where the real problem lies. It’s big, dumb, inefficient government thank you very much!

 
Obama discovers black gold

Nine to one! That's the margin of black votes that Barry Obama got over Hillary Clinton among black voters in Mississippi. What if that same margin existed for white voting in favor of Clinton? Wouldn't the media be all over that story?

Yet they think nothing of merely mentioning the disparity for Obama.

I've said previously that Clinton is getting the sort of treatment from black voters that is normally reserved for Republicans, and today, Geraldine Ferraro called something for what it is: she said that Obama would be nowhere in the picture if he weren't black.

That truth seems to have made Democrats crazier, but the fact is, no white guy named Barry' would even have the audacity to run for President with the sort of experience Obama has "ammasses," so the fact that said white guy would never have been taken seriously doesn't even enter into it.

And let's get something else on the table: not only is Obama not qualified, he's not even that great a speaker, much less an orator. He's merely, as Joe Biden described him,: "clean and articulate." All the other qualities that have been attributed to him are desirously imagined by his supporters.

That doesn't mean it will evaporate. The same sort of imaginary qualities were once accorded Bill Clinton and it took liberals sixteen years to see what conservatives saw in 1992, so Obama might get lucky as well. However, the other possibility is that scrutiny may be greater for him than it was for Clinton and for several reasons:

1) His inexperience not only can't be camouflaged, it is becoming more apparent.

2) Ditto his immaturity.

3) Half of his own party is not on board, and it has nothing to do with prejudice.

4) Independents are fickle. If they start to see the real Obama, a lot of his support could evaporate.

And the system the Dems have crafted is a thing of beauty. Even a significant Obama victory in Mississippi doesn't necessarily give him substantially more delegates than Hillary. That's gotta eat at his black and young supporters, one would think.

The super-delegates are another matter altogether. They're there to make sure "democracy" doesn't run amok, and if they do their job right, it could rip the Democratic Party apart.

In theory, the super-Ds would get behind the people's clear choice, which, when this all started, they thought would be Hillary Clinton. Now that there is no clear choice, and an entire constituency is ripe for
disenfranchisement, well, it doesn't get any better… unless it happens.

And did you see Ferraro on Fox? She was not only unapologetic, she forcefully said that Clinton couldn't rein her in, and she actually warned Obama not to alienate her because he was going need her later.

None of this is a surprise to conservatives who always knew the Dems were playing with fire in their pandering to racial and ethnic groups, but who could have expected such delightful manifestations of those consequences, much less imagine where they might still lead?

You keep thinking, oh the Dems will eventually reconcile and all will be forgotten, but will they? and will it? Hasn't a certain amount of damage already been done? Not only are they fighting amongst themselves, but they are exposing flaws in the individual candidates that the Republicans must have thought they'd have trouble getting the voters to consider on their own.

And thinking that the Obama youth and race vote would gravitate to Hillary if Barry isn't nominated is sheer fantasy. However, it does seem clear now that if Hillary is the nominee, she absolutely will ask Obama to be her VP, and I believe that despite the animosity, he'd accept, and that could be the Republicans' worst nightmare.

But don't get me wrong, even that nightmare isn't insurmountable, it's simply the best ticket the Dems can put forth, and as Rush Limbaugh has said, "They don't have a prayer." I wouldn't go that far, but I would agree that there are unknown negatives in such a ticket.

We tend to concentrate on the apparent positives – woman, black… that's about it. But those are also the ticket's negatives. At least its main negatives, and there are more – inexperience, Hillary's unlikeability…
Bill Clinton, not to mention the horrible positions and plans such a ticket would advance.

Of course, McCain has his own negatives, and I don't see anyone other than Romney who can possibly solve the VP problem, not that Romney is a stellar choice.

But I'm rooting for the Democrats right now – to self-destruct. It seems easy enough to avoid, but then I can't think like a Democrat, and I certainly don't want to be responsible for putting a rational thought in their heads. Where's the fun in that?