Posts Tagged ‘evolution’
EVOLUTION: A black and white issue?

Back during Barack Obama’s campaign, I noted in a cartoon the amazing similarity of Michelle Obama to the Geico cavemen. Having a rather caveman-shaped forehead myself, I felt this was fair game and a funny way to work in yet another dig on Chairman Maobama.

But I’ve been thinking–primarily about the cartoons I could have done, and I’ve had a stunning realization about Western society: The Theory of Evolution really is just another way to keep the black man down.

See, all of those nature-worshipping elitists that push Darwinism and Lamarckism believe that mankind evolved from monkeys. And, that the first human was a skeleton found in Africa that has been named "Lucy," who was a black woman. Ergo, mankind evolved from black women.

Now at first glance, a lot of black people (I use the color-descriptive term, because Africa isn’t full of just black people) might take pride in this scientific quackery, that their race was the first race. And, that they are the oldest, noblest progenitors of mankind. But that also implies they are the least evolved.

Remember, Lamarck and Darwin came up with their heathen blasphemies about man’s origin in the 1800’s, a time in world history when in the West, black men and women were deemed sub-human. In that age, white western men considered themselves the top of the food chain, their way of rationalizing centuries of slave trading.

For Europe, black men, and even native Americans, were not the same as "normal" men. The Spanish used the same rationale for justifying their invasion of the New World and forcing the natives to convert to Christianity.

Even "Evolution of Man" charts show the black man following apes, with white men following black men. Does all this mean that Barack Obama was the less-evolved candidate? That Americans have chosen a primitive paleo-liberal as their next president? Maybe, if you wear a pillow case over your head and like lighting crosses on fire.

Without getting all preachy, let me just close by expressing my sheer wonder that this hasn’t been noticed by the black caucuses and the NAACP before. Not really surprising since they have sought reparations from the United States, rather than the African nations that originally placed modern Black Americans' ancestors into slavery, and then sold them (if anyone could afford reparations, surely it would be the oil rich countries of Africa and the Middle East who are historically infamous for slave trading).

Now, it’s little wonder to me that so many black children going through our heathen school systems grow up feeling as though they don’t fit in with the rest of society. Or that all the rich, liberal snobs’ children grow up thinking they are better and that blacks need money thrown at them. Basically, we're subliminally telling young blacks that they're little more than animals.

This whole personal discovery has led me to revile Darwin and Lamarck even more than ever (something I never would have thought possible). Perhaps with a less-evolved president we could make some true progress and do away with the racist teachings of Evolution and begin telling our children that all men truly are created equal…not evolved differently.

 
Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Conclusion

Here is the final installment of the ID/Evo debate.

 
Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part VII

This segment is particularly entertaining as Evo critic Dr. Berlinski questions Evo proponent Dr. Miller on the number of changes necessary to take a dog to a whale. Miller accedes to as few as ten changes in the "test" cases for speciation, to which Berlinski responds by pointing out that the "test" cases were species very close morphologically to one another. Whereas a dog and a whale are very far apart. Miller's response? So is that wall over there and it shouldn't surprise you that I can get there one step at a time. At this response the mostly Darwinian audience erupted in applause, as though this were some kind of substantive answer on the part of Miller.

However, since this video was done, Berlinski, who is a mathematician, has indeed attempted to enumerate the number of changes necessary. He stopped counting at 50,000, because the number of changes necessary to get from dog to whale are so staggering, not even an evolutionary adaptation scenario can account for them given the amount of time allocated to make the alleged jump. Still, that doesn't stop brilliant scientists like Miller from believing this drivel. Nor does it stop his many admirers like those in attendance for this debate from buying into Evo theory. Someone from the Evo side should've stood up and demanded Dr. Miller answer the question. They didn't; and the moderator, who was obviously an Evo devotee, didn't press the point.