<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MyThoughtWorld.com &#187; evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mythoughtworld.com/tag/evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mythoughtworld.com</link>
	<description>All Things Relevant To Your World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EVOLUTION: A black and white issue?</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/1015/evolution-a-black-and-white-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/1015/evolution-a-black-and-white-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troglodad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cavemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lamarck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back during Barack Obama’s campaign, I noted in a cartoon the amazing similarity of Michelle Obama to the Geico cavemen. Having a rather caveman-shaped forehead myself, I felt this was fair game and a funny way to work in yet another dig on Chairman Maobama. But I’ve been thinking–primarily about the cartoons I could have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/1015/evolution-a-black-and-white-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Conclusion</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/792/intelligent-designevolution-debate-conclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/792/intelligent-designevolution-debate-conclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secularism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/792/intelligent-designevolution-debate-conclusion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the final installment of the ID/Evo debate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/792/intelligent-designevolution-debate-conclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part VII</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/791/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vii/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/791/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secularism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/791/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This segment is particularly entertaining as Evo critic Dr. Berlinski questions Evo proponent Dr. Miller on the number of changes necessary to take a dog to a whale. Miller accedes to as few as ten changes in the "test" cases for speciation, to which Berlinski responds by pointing out that the "test" cases were species [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/791/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part VI</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/790/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vi/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/790/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secularism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/790/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More in the continuing saga of those debating design vs. naturalism.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/790/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part V</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/789/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-v/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/789/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-v/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/789/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-v/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should've titled this series, Intelligent Design vs. Intelligent Design given the theistic evolution mindset of the "naturalistic" evolutionist team. It's still good viewing, with the evolutionists totally immersed in all things theological and the ID people trying desperately to keep the subject on critiquing the science. So far the best the evolutionist team could [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/789/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck interviews Ben Stein</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/793/glen-beck-interviews-ben-stein/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/793/glen-beck-interviews-ben-stein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expelled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/793/glen-beck-interviews-ben-stein/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the striking things about this clip is the footage from the Expelled movie showing Richard Dawkins making a plea for Intelligent Design. When you get done checking out the video, take a gander at Ron McClure Jr.'s post which underscores Dawkins' preternatural ability to show the world what a reptilian ass looks like&#8230;macroevolution [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/793/glen-beck-interviews-ben-stein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hickory-Dickery Dawkins</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/781/hickory-dickery-dawkins/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/781/hickory-dickery-dawkins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron McClure Jr.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/781/hickory-dickery-dawkins/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Deconstruction of an Urban Legend Writer’s note: (Italics should be read like a parent to a child, with a lot of enthusiasm and dynamics.) Once upon a time, there was a Great Zoologist from Great Britain. It is said that he could deflate an argument with a single syllable. In fact, he is said [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/781/hickory-dickery-dawkins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More tilting at mammoths</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/710/more-tilting-at-mammoths/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/710/more-tilting-at-mammoths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de-evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/710/more-tilting-at-mammoths/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent find shows more assumptions than certitude MSNBC via Reuters reveals that the remains of yet another baby mammoth are being studied in Russia. So far they have done the typical medical scans that scientists do for ancient creatures/humans in order to better understand the inner organs of the animal. They are also decoding its [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/710/more-tilting-at-mammoths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case for a Creator: Part II</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/646/the-case-for-a-creator-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/646/the-case-for-a-creator-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lance Ponder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missing links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/646/the-case-for-a-creator-part-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: Lance Ponder continues his series summarizing Lee Strobel’s book, The Case for a Creator. Refuting homologous embryos from different species First Problem: In the 1860’s Ernst Haeckel’s studied the embryos of various species in the animal kingdom. After observing these embryos, Haeckel rendered drawings, which depicted embryos of a fish, a salamander, a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/646/the-case-for-a-creator-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution in space: hopeful philosophy and pipe dreams?</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/639/evolution-in-space-hopeful-philosophy-and-pipe-dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/639/evolution-in-space-hopeful-philosophy-and-pipe-dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panspermia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/639/evolution-in-space-hopeful-philosophy-and-pipe-dreams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a trend in evolutionary thinking to push the origin of life into space. It’s an idea which is becoming more and more popular. Evolutionists believe that the early atmosphere of the earth was made up of a “soup” of chemicals-a “bath”-that would be toxic to us, but in their eyes would be necessary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/639/evolution-in-space-hopeful-philosophy-and-pipe-dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

