Posts Tagged ‘government spending’
THOR’S DAY RANT: Your Tax Dollars, at work?

Lately, people sure have been bellyaching about Chairman Maobama’s many socialized intentions for their tax dollars. People don’t seem to want universal healthcare, or bank bailouts, or government nationalization of the auto industry.

But before we start tackling those big issues, I think we need to go back to the beginning and take some baby steps as we walk through how our tax dollars are being spent — like employing slackers.

I remember when I got out of the service and returned home. One of the first jobs I tried in my return to civilian life was as a Security Guard at the U.S. Census Bureau in Jeffersonville, IN. The job was simple — walking around, relieving guards who checked employees' ID cards, so they, the guards, could go to lunch. It also let me see all of the various work areas at the Bureau.

The Census Bureau has a lot of unique machines, made especially for their mission. And when those machines break, special parts have to be ordered and people can’t work. Do they send those people home? Nope. They pay them to sit around, playing cards, reading books and chatting on the phone.

Chatting on the phone instead of doing the job taxpayers are paying you to do isn’t confined to just Federal government either. I worked for years in County Government, and our receptionist was — and still is, I hear — a master of slackery. She sits with her back to the lobby, hunched over her phone, a hand held up to cover her mouth as she conspiratorially shares gossip with the other old biddies in the building (when she isn’t actually hanging out in their offices, doing it in person). And being in local government, she’s heavy into politics and involved in a lot of elections. Twice, I overheard her planning campaign functions when she should be working for her elected official — not other folks seeking election. This was in between all the dozen or so personal calls she would take during the day. It's a wonder any office calls ever got answered.

As if all that wasn’t enough, the receptionist also was a master at watching TV at her desk when she was supposed to be working — a small black and white 5″ TV tucked under the counter (what will she do now, that Analog is dead?). She also liked to come in a half hour early and then leave work early as well. Unfortunately, instead of working that early half hour, she would sit in the break room sipping coffee (and gossiping), or paint her nails at her desk, ignoring those before-hours calls from the public.

This still isn’t all the slackery that goes on in government. There’s the half-hour smoke breaks where nicotine addicts sneak away and congregate in forbidden basement corridors, rotting their lungs and gossiping. There’s the hour-and-a-half lunch hours, where gaggles of female workers go shopping instead of eating. For hourly employees, they have to make this up. Salaried workers however seem to magically neglect that 40 hours they agreed to work.

For men, there’s the afternoon golf game in the summer, or yakking about some ball game they saw last night for a half hour in the morning. Oh, sure, stress at work requires a little goofing off now and then, or those government employees will go crazy. Most believe they are underpaid, after all.

And I’m sure these kind of things go on in private industry. But that’s private. Employers could view it as an unofficial benefit — overlooking slackerism as a way to say thanks to people that maybe work hard at other times. But what about government?

Has our government been working hard for us? Should we, as taxpayers, be content that our elected officials and their staffs blow off early to go to the track, or go home for an early start on that three day weekend? We don’t have a choice when it comes to paying our taxes. And the only say we get in the performance of elected officials is on election day. That just doesn’t seem fair.

The Federal government has a big program targeted at eliminating Fraud, Waste and Abuse. They have hotlines that Federal employees can call with money saving ideas, and they give out bonuses for folks whose ideas work. Why then is there not a push to eliminate slackers? All levels of government are constantly preaching about sexual harassment in the work place. So, why not hammer slackeral avoidance on government employees as well?

Here’s my idea to reduce Fraud, Waste and Abuse in the government workplace: cut the dead wood, and put my tax dollars to work, instead of at work.

 
Musings From The Old Man – Part 3

Several weeks ago, I cautioned us to be wary of politicians bearing gifts. Well, today we know some of the details – we are about to get almost $800 billion in government spending that is supposed to reach into every neighborhood across the land, stimulate the economy, and create or save roughly 3½ million jobs. Do you believe it? Do you feel better off so far? Let’s start with a few basics:

1.     How much is $800 billion? Well, if you had spent $1 million per day, every day, since the birth of Christ, you’d be in the neighborhood. Or if you simply gave every man, woman, and child in this country $2,600, you’d be about there.

2.     If we pay down this debt by increasing the amount of the budget allocated to interest from 8% to 10% (a 25% increase), we’ll have to reduce other spending by perhaps $75 billion a year, and continue to do so for the next 20 years to pay this down. As John McCain said on “Face the Nation” last week, “It’s intergenerational theft!”

3.     What does a single state’s share of the goodies look like? Let’s take mine – Georgia: $1.7 billion for Medicaid, $1.2 billion for education, $1 billion for roads and bridges, $333 million for special education, $90 million for public housing, $82 million for child care, $33 million for homelessness prevention, $20 million for Head Start, etc. – a total of $5.9 billion for what? Does any of this look like it creates lots of jobs? Does any of this address mortgages or the credit crisis?

Our senior senator, Johnny Isakson, proposed an amendment to the “stimulus” that would have reduced mortgage rates to 4% and provided an incentive payment to anyone buying a home in order to jump-start the real estate, mortgage, and home building industries. Of course, his amendment was defeated along party lines. The Harry R. and Nancy P. railroad would not be side-tracked.

But I’ll leave you with these 3 questions to consider: if mortgages led us into this mess, should not mortgages lead us out of it? And if the single largest asset for most of the middle class is the family home, must we not stabilize the value of homes as our first order of business? And if bad mortgages are plugging up the credit markets, should we not lower mortgage rates and restructure salvageable mortgages as a first step to re-liquidate these markets?

Face it, the stimulus is one big Democratic orgy of special-interest spending with little in the way of economic recovery except wishful thinking. I know talking about economics is not very sexy, but I have never in my lifetime seen anything like this for big-government log rolling, and it is downright scary!