Posts Tagged ‘Hollywood’
WGA strike ends

Writers getting back to work 'immediately'

With the picket lines having been walked for 100 days, the Writer’s Guild of America vote to end the strike became official on Tuesday, February 12th, with a whopping 92.5% of the members voting to return to work. The voting took place shortly after the WGA and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) came to a contractual agreement the prior Saturday morning.

The AMTMP expressed their relief in a letter signed by the heads of the main TV and movie studios, such as Disney, CBS and Warner Brothers. The strike has been extraordinarily difficult for all of us, but the hardest hit of all have been the many thousands of businesses, workers and families that are economically dependent on our industry. We hope now to focus our collective efforts on what this industry does best — writers, directors, actors, production crews, and entertainment companies working together to deliver great content to our worldwide audiences.”

Hopes were high once the Director’s Guild of America (DGA) reached an agreement with AMTMP themselves in late January. The same template was used to for the WGA’s agreement, making progress rapid once both sides sat down at the table. The SAG-AFTRA contract ends on June 30th, and the hopes are high that this same template will come into play once negotiations begin.

The WGA agreement, like the DGA agreement before it, includes a percentage of the distributor’s gross profits – the core issue behind the strike.

Members of the WGA voted over a period of 48 hours either in person at the WGA Theater or Gotham’s Crowne Plaza Hotel, or via fax. 3,492 members voted in favor of ending the strike, while 283 members voted against. WGA West Prexy, Patric Verrone said that WGA members are free to return to work “immediately” – just in time to begin writing the Oscar’s ceremony to be aired on February 24th.

 
Junk Food for the Mind

Until just a few years ago, I only had a handful of TV channels at my disposal. When my wife and I decided to get cable internet, we also decided to get cable TV along with it. If you are one who has cable, how often have you looked at the more than 100 channels that you had in the evening and realized that there was nothing on? Sure there was something. But how often did you find that there was nothing you really wanted to watch?

There is a lot of really awful programming on television, and many people mindlessly watch this stuff. A lot of garbage is streaming into mainstream America. Children and their families are inundated with sexualized imagery, the glamorization of drugs, decadent culture, and of course, bad ideas (the mind-numbingly constant promotion of political correctness) 24/7. I call it junk food for the mind, utterly lacking in substance or wholesomeness. Yet, to actively oppose ingesting this “head candy” will invite certain doom from the P.C. thought police.

For example, you wouldn’t dare take all of these things off television, because that would “violate free speech.” This is nonsense. Who says the government has to be the one to do it? I understand the importance of free speech, but whatever happened to self-censorship? Why does everything have to be about decadence? Why do we need to learn about some rock star’s quest for his version of love? Why do we need to learn about the problems of ten or twenty young people living together in a house and trying to get along with each other, even though they all came from dysfunctional settings? The same problems apply to the movies. It seems that if you’re going to create a movie, you have to get at least two hours of decadence in; maybe you’ll even get an Academy Award or an Oscar for it.

Recently, we learned of the tragic death of Heath Ledger. It’s not certain whether this was accidental or what, but it seems reasonable the lifestyle Hollywood encourages didn’t add value to Ledger’s life. Part of the reason for this is that Hollywood is a facade. When you are an actor, you might play some interesting and “deep” characters, but that doesn’t replace the depth of real life lived. (Sometimes I wonder too, how often actors or actresses think “This person I played lived a really tortured and tragic lifestyle,” if I’m going to really live, I have to as well.)

How many of these people cultivate more than what’s on the surface? I know that a few do. But this doesn’t come out in the television and movie fare. How many of them could you say are learned people who actually support causes that they’re truly knowledgeable about, rather than just doing “charity” films (that will bomb) or supporting fringe causes because they’re politically correct? (My definition of a “charity” film is a film about a Hollywood cause that really isn’t a charity that the average moviegoer doesn’t really care about and never will. It seems that actors and actresses feel they have to do these lousy movies to “broaden their horizons” and show that they’re “edgy.” Then they’ll most certainly get an industry award). Probably the most acclaimed role in recent times (acclaimed by Hollywood that is) was the role that Ledger took up as a homosexual cowboy. This is not what mainstream America cares about or is interested in.

Probably, with the advent of Ledger’s untimely demise, he will always be known for that role. It’s sad really, because he had other more promising roles, including his role in The Patriot.

But moving on, the lifestyles that Hollywood tends to glorify are the unsavory ones. When drugs, promiscuous sex, and tortured lives are portrayed, it’s fashionable and Academy Award worthy. But most of the time, this is not what moviegoers are really interested in watching. Real, hard fought struggle in a film is good; think of movies like Master and Commander, Cinderella Man, or The Patriot, for example. Such notable examples draw viewers without having to appeal to the profligate values which have come to symbolize pop culture. Anti-Americanism and the glorification of moral decadence on the other hand, yawn.

We’re no longer shocked; that passed a long time ago. We just don’t feel like shelling out ten bucks or more per person for a crappy movie. Consumers, you’ll get a lot more out of reading a good book or practicing a musical instrument for a few hours. At least you’ll have something to show for the time spent. Adults and children alike will be better off consuming less junk food for the mind. –Cal Samuel August

 
Did you have a predator Christmas?

2008 is here; Christmas is over; and like always, it felt like the season went too fast and wasn’t all that Christmasy. Grudgingly, I have to admit that in light of the 2007 Christmas season, 20th Century Fox was right: there was no peace on Earth.

At least, that’s what Fox was hoping for; that was their marketing slogan for the new Alien vs. Predator: Requiem movie released on Christmas day.When I first heard that Fox was releasing an alien killing spree on Christmas day, I immediately quipped "Man, I bet Jesus is excited." I was being sarcastic. And, despite my eagerness to see the film, I put off doing so until the Saturday after Christmas, so I could actually celebrate the birth of Christ with my family, rather than the release of a film all about gruesome deaths.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I LOVE the Predator, Alien, and Alien vs. Predator film franchises. I even shelled out $140 for a museum-quality Predator action figure made by a company in China to set on a shelf in the movie room of my house. And I have stacks of Predator comics from the 1980s and 90s. And I’m always dreaming about the Predator facing off against other movie monster greats like the Gillman or Graboids.

But a Christmas day release? And "no peace on Earth"?

That’s a little bit much, don’t you think?

Well, apparently you all didn’t think the same thing as me. Turns out AVP:R came in third for all time successful, Christmas-day releases, raking in $9.5 million dollars in just one day. By week’s end, AVP:R had earned $30.6 Million.

That’s a lot of humbugs going to the movies when they should have been home.

When I was a single man, I would have been thrilled by the prospect of a decent action movie being at the theater on Christmas day. Of course, the only time I’ve ever actually went to the movies on Christmas was to see Batteries not Included back in 1987. But even that lame-o movie was released on December 18th, not Christmas day.

Again, I have to ask, what was Fox thinking?! Christmas is about remembering the birth of Christ. It’s about good will to others, charity and kindness. It’s about giving presents, not taking lives, acid-blooded monsters, and face-hugging creatures that implant flesh-eating embryos in hosts.
Ah, but why bother lecturing about what Christmas should have been. It’s over, and most of you are now probably obsessed with how to burn off all that weight you gained eating Christmas treats- and movie popcorn.

But not me! I’m looking forward to the next Predator and Alien films. In fact, I have a few ideas for them.

For a Valentine’s release, I suggest Aliens vs. Cupid. Love leads to procreation, and the alien facehuggers are all about clinging to victim’s faces and implanting alien embryos inside hosts. Maybe for a movie tie in, we could have chocolate-covered spiders?

For an Easter release, Fox could rush out Elmo vs. Predator. Elmo is a monster after all- exactly what the Predator hunts. True, the Predator cutting down the Easter Bunny with his shoulder-mounted plasma cannon would be super traumatic for children, but what chance does the Easter Bunny have against a cloaked predator? At least Elmo is part monster, and has lots of monster friends. I think it’s high time we had some alien killing on Sesame Street.

I mean, who cares about the resurrection of Christ when you can sell movie tickets?

My best idea though, is for Fox to not drag their feet on releasing AVP:R on DVD. There are already bootlegs of it on the internet. So why not release AVP:R on DVD on Good Friday. And pack that sucker full of easter eggs.