<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MyThoughtWorld.com &#187; philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mythoughtworld.com/tag/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mythoughtworld.com</link>
	<description>All Things Relevant To Your World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Objectivity is impossible</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/862/objectivity-is-impossible/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/862/objectivity-is-impossible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POP culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/?p=862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one has objectivity. I'm paraphrasing a dear friend of mine's view that people can't be objective because their brain function as well as their experience clouds their perception of reality. The subject of objectivity came up in passing as my friend and I were discussing brain function and its corresponding software. I don't share [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/862/objectivity-is-impossible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Conclusion</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/792/intelligent-designevolution-debate-conclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/792/intelligent-designevolution-debate-conclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secularism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/792/intelligent-designevolution-debate-conclusion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the final installment of the ID/Evo debate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/792/intelligent-designevolution-debate-conclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part VII</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/791/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vii/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/791/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secularism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/791/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This segment is particularly entertaining as Evo critic Dr. Berlinski questions Evo proponent Dr. Miller on the number of changes necessary to take a dog to a whale. Miller accedes to as few as ten changes in the "test" cases for speciation, to which Berlinski responds by pointing out that the "test" cases were species [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/791/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part VI</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/790/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vi/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/790/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secularism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/790/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More in the continuing saga of those debating design vs. naturalism.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/790/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-vi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part V</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/789/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-v/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/789/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-v/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/789/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-v/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should've titled this series, Intelligent Design vs. Intelligent Design given the theistic evolution mindset of the "naturalistic" evolutionist team. It's still good viewing, with the evolutionists totally immersed in all things theological and the ID people trying desperately to keep the subject on critiquing the science. So far the best the evolutionist team could [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/789/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part IV</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/788/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-iv/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/788/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-iv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materialist mythology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/788/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-iv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part IV of the intelD/Evo Debate. An especially humorous observation about this debate is that fully half of the Naturalistic Evolution Team believe in God guided evolution and therefore in the loosest sense, qualify as ID theorists.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/788/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-iv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution: Part III</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/787/intelligent-designevolution-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/787/intelligent-designevolution-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/787/intelligent-designevolution-part-iii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part III of the ID vs. Naturalistic Evolution debate Featuring Michael Ruse, David Berlinski, et al.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/787/intelligent-designevolution-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate:Part II</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/786/intelligent-designevolution-debatepart-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/786/intelligent-designevolution-debatepart-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/786/intelligent-designevolution-debatepart-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This series features some of the big names in evolutionary biology and Intelligent Design going head to head.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/786/intelligent-designevolution-debatepart-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck interviews Ben Stein</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/793/glen-beck-interviews-ben-stein/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/793/glen-beck-interviews-ben-stein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expelled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/793/glen-beck-interviews-ben-stein/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the striking things about this clip is the footage from the Expelled movie showing Richard Dawkins making a plea for Intelligent Design. When you get done checking out the video, take a gander at Ron McClure Jr.'s post which underscores Dawkins' preternatural ability to show the world what a reptilian ass looks like&#8230;macroevolution [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/793/glen-beck-interviews-ben-stein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate: Part I</title>
		<link>http://mythoughtworld.com/785/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://mythoughtworld.com/785/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mythoughtworld.com/785/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-i/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first installment of a debate featuring the big guns of both Naturalistic Evolution and Intelligent Design.  I think you'll find it engrossing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mythoughtworld.com/785/intelligent-designevolution-debate-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

