Posts Tagged ‘values’
NBC’s “Average Joe” exposed in swine production ring

Earlier today, I stumbled onto a reality show called, “Average Joe.” The basic premise revolves around a beauty queen who is trying to find her soul-mate, or “someone to help her perpetuate Planned Parenthood” (it’s hard to tell). I knew that these dating shows were shallow and immoral, but I was inclined to root for the average “Joe,” seeing as how I grew up as one and have been given the old heave-ho (no pun intended) for the “pretty boy” jerk more than once. I thought to myself, “maybe I was just too soft, and maybe an ordinary ‘Joe’ with more self-confidence can do what I never could, ‘beat out the jock.’” I quickly assumed some warped personal attachment to these underdogs, and reluctantly decided to watch.

The girl, who I’ll call “Amber,” was very attractive and ironically seemed very sweet. She poured compliments on the “Average Joe” contestants, and I thought to myself, “maybe I’ve just had bad experiences.” Maybe, just maybe, a girl can be physically attractive and also adhere to the, “it’s the personality that counts,” rhetoric spewed by many women…maybe, I had just been jilted one too many times, and had grown callous from all of the wounds. :-(

Anyway, the show later introduced some new contestants, however these guys were the type of “pretty boys” I spoke of earlier (this show referred to them as “jocks”). As they sashayed into the room, Amber was reduced to a bowl of jelly, and she smiled from ear to ear as saliva dripped from her chin. She never considered the average “Joe’s” again…she was captivated. When the producers instructed Amber to choose a date for the night, she didn’t hesitate for a second. “Rocky!” she exclaimed (that’s what this jock called himself). Rocky? You’re kidding, right? Apparently, he had successfully marketed himself (and his chiseled body); because, in a brief moment, Amber had been beguiled like a 9 month-old playing with a set of keys, while being serenaded with a recitation of “this little piggy went to the market.” When interviewed, she claimed that she had “felt some connection” the moment they made eye contact.

Really? We of the “male” persuasion tend to experience that from time to time, too! It’s commonly referred to as, lust! Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mean to marginalize the negative effects of lust, because after all, why do women call men pigs? Because, men ARE lusting machines. Most women CLAIM to be “above that,” and when they lust, they write it off as “chemistry” or “connection.” Certainly, most women are above this primal curse (I hope), but what kind of message does this crap send to young men and women? To a young man it says, “if you work out, talk smooth and ‘act mysterious’…you will nail virtually every chick, nearly every time.” To young women it blazons, “plaster the word ‘juicy’ across your @$$, and men will love you,” when in reality, men just like “connecting” with your caboose.

How do young people stand a chance of finding happiness in today’s society when TV says, “if you pretend to be something you’re not…you’ll score”?

Continuing onward, some interesting developments arose on the show when the Joe’s and jocks were sent on a “guys’ night out” to a local bar that was “supposed” to be away from the cameras. Of course, the show’s producers made sure cameras were rolling and even took the liberty of sending in several attractive women to “flirt” with (more like seduce) the guys. Long story short, one of the guys kissed “another woman.” When Amber confronted the contestant’s infidelity, her chin quivered as the tears rolled down her sweet little, “innocent” face. She was devastated. I mean, how could he have kissed another girl? Never mind that in the past few weeks Amber herself had her tongue down the throats of no less than a half dozen different blokes.

That wasn’t the end of it, however. Like in a good ol’ monkey melee, handfuls of crap were hurled at this guy. She had indubitably been forsaken by this modern-day Judas, and he obviously didn’t care about her if he could… would… “BETRAY HER LIKE THAT!!”

Amber, along with the producers of Average Joe would have you believe that she was victimized by this guy. It matters little that he kissed one girl, ONE, and he had to be entrapped in order for that to happen. He’s just a two-timing whore of a man; a deceitful libertine that has not one decent bone in his body; a pig whose thought processes don’t rise above his basest desires. Meanwhile, sweet little Amber has EVERY right to “sample” a buffet of men. And she can do it with a clear conscience, because after all, “she’s confused and having a hard time deciding whom to choose” (poor, poor woman). It’s all very sad.

Almost every man has a story about being “the nice guy” (because that’s what women say that they want). But these stories usually end with our hero’s heart ripped from his blood soaked thorax and haughtily cast to the ground. The real she-devils are sure to give it a good stomp to eradicate any residual capacity to trust.

It’s no wonder some men are the way they are. It only takes a couple of times to get kicked in the teeth, before you start wearing a face-mask. What idiot would keep serving up his chin to his opponent, knowing the deadly uppercut is lurking behind that pretty smile and floral scent? Guard your faces fellas, because this world is messed up!

 
The United States: where terrorists are treated like U.S. citizens

Another wacky ruling came down from the Supreme Court this week…or was that last week? With all the screwy rulings coming down the pike from higher courts, it’s hard to keep track. Anyway, it turns out that these days when the “honorable” silky libertines aren’t ruling in favor of killing babies they’re up for treating terrorists like law abiding U.S. citizens. And they’re not alone in their sentiment, but I’ll come to that a little later. For the moment, let us explore the inherent nuttiness of the left-handed rules in place with the Supreme Court.

In a 5-4 ruling, with liberal judges clearly in the majority, terrorists (or suspected terrorists) held at Guantanamo Bay Cuba now have the right to challenge their detention under the U.S. Constitution in civilian courts.

What does that mean? Simply this, that “defense lawyers can now argue that their clients have the right to confront their accusers and not incriminate themselves, both of which have been denied under the Military Commissions Act.” What is this but another coup de tat by the liberal wing of the Supreme Court to impose their arbitrary will upon Americans? It’s a tale wagging the dog kind of thing when a handful of unelected activist judges can impose their stupidity on the rest of us.

This is scary stuff folks, especially given the current political climate. If conditions hold, expect Barack Obama to take the White House this year. Provided Americans don’t throw liberal Democrats out on their arses, this is exactly the kind of ruling and subsequent legislation which will be imposed on the American people in an avalanche of liberal legislation from the Hill and liberal rulings from the Supreme Court. Does anybody care? Probably not…

But maybe the following excerpts will convince you of what we’re dealing with here in a broader context…the general election. We turn our attention to Barack Obama (again) and his cavorting sidekick, John Kerry.

“…[I]n an interview with ABC News. Obama was asked how he could be sure the Bush administration's anti-terrorism policies are not crucial to protecting U.S. citizens.”

Interestingly, he never substantiated his claim to answer the question directly. Instead, he said this:

"And, you know, let's take the example of Guantanamo," Obama said. "What we know is that, in previous terrorist attacks — for example, the first attack against the World Trade Center — we were able to arrest those responsible, put them on trial. They are currently in U.S. prisons, incapacitated.

"And the fact that the administration has not tried to do that has created a situation where not only have we never actually put many of these folks on trial, but we have destroyed our credibility when it comes to rule of law all around the world, and given a huge boost to terrorist recruitment in countries that say, 'Look, this is how the United States treats Muslims. …

This is how the United States treats Muslims? How do these interviewers just let statements like that go? This isn’t how the U.S. treats Muslims, and Barack Obama damn well knows it; this is how we treat terrorists. I wish to God he’d stop lying through his teeth and just admit that the only reason he pukes out rhetoric like that is because a lot of Americans are just gullible enough to believe it.

But let’s keep going, he went on to opine about what Muslims around the world think of our treatment of terrorists at Guantanamo. He’s quite worried about it. Muslim terrorist sympathizers around the world don’t like how we treat terrorists. That treatment (it’s claimed) increases recruit numbers for the terrorist effort, so let’s be nicer…to the terrorists. Let’s treat them like U.S. citizens. ‘Cause after all, when terrorists do what terrorists do, they should be treated well, otherwise, Muslims around the globe will get mad at us. I don’t know what’s worse, that he said it or that so many folks are nodding their heads in agreement with this nonsense. It makes perfect “sense” to me: Terrorism will evaporate if we just treat terrorists like U.S. citizens. Why didn’t it occur to me before? It’s so simple and yet, so…stupid! That’s probably why it didn’t occur to me before.

If that weren’t enough John Kerry couldn’t resist getting into the act as well saying, "The U.S. is less safe, less respected and less able to lead in the world, and that is the record John McCain has chosen to embrace." After reading that quote I was overcome with the strangest feeling of De Ja Vu. I could swear I’ve heard that line before…like in 2004 when Kerry said it the first time. 4 years later along comes Obama and parrots this garbage as if it were some new and startling revelation. And you’ve really gotta hand it to these liberals; they’ve learned a valuable lesson through politics and the media: if you just repeat the same crap over and over again, people will eventually believe it. In fact, they’ll believe it so blindly; they won’t even think to question it.

There’s nothing new here folks. These are the same liberal myths we heard during the Kerry campaign, so it shouldn’t surprise us that Obama is hauling these well worn liberal clichés out of mothballs. I wish to God these knuckleheads would sing a new song, but apparently, this is all they’re capable of: lies, lies…oh, yeah, and more lies, which suits Obama just fine as he is only too happy to regurgitate Kerry’s lines from the previous musical production. To reiterate:

1. Bush policies have made the U.S. less safe. And…

2. We’ve given a huge boost to terrorist recruitment in Muslim friendly countries.

Somehow it never occurs to the poor dumb interviewer to ask how the “venerable” Kerry and Obama have arrived at their conclusions. Can Obama, Kerry, the interviewer, or the viewing public corroborate these claims? No…But that certainly won’t stop many otherwise well intentioned and possibly good people from lapping this stuff up like starving curs.

I really should stop now before I slide under a gas truck and taste my own blood.

 
Obama Wan Kenobi

Featuring the Jedi mind tricks of Barack Obama.

WARNING: Viewing this video may cause you to become an Obama supporter.

Once again, the hat tip goes to DWSUWF for this incisive video docudrama.